BerandaComputers and TechnologySS Edmund Fitzgerald (sank 45 years ago today)

SS Edmund Fitzgerald (sank 45 years ago today)

Edmund Fitzgerald, 1971, 3 of 4 (restored).jpg

Edmund Fitzgerald in 1971

History
United States
Name: Edmund Fitzgerald
Owner: Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Operator: Columbia Transportation Division, Oglebay Norton Company of Cleveland, Ohio
Port of registry: Milwaukee, United States
Ordered: February 1, 1957
Builder: Great Lakes Engineering Works of River Rouge, Michigan
Yard number: 301
Laid down: August 7, 1957
Launched: June 7, 1958
Maiden voyage: September 24, 1958
In service: June 8, 1958
Out of service: November 10, 1975
Identification: Registry number US 277437
Nickname(s): Fitz, Mighty Fitz, Big Fitz, Pride of the American Side, Toledo Express, Titanic of the Great Lakes
Fate: Lost in a storm on November 10, 1975, with all 29 crew members
Status: Wreck
Notes: Location: 46°59.91′N 85°06.61′W / 46.99850°N 85.11017°WCoordinates: 46°59.91′N 85°06.61′W / 46.99850°N 85.11017°W
General characteristics
Type: Lake freighter
Tonnage:
  • 13,632 GRT
  • 8,713 NRT (from 1969: 8,686 NRT)
  • 26,000 DWT
Length:
Beam: 75 ft (23 m)
Draft: 25 ft (7.6 m) typical
Depth: 39 ft (12 m) (moulded)
Depth of hold: 33 ft 4 in (10.16 m)
Installed power:
  • As built:
  • Coal fired Westinghouse Electric Corporation steam turbine at 7,500 shp (5,600 kW)
  • After refit:
  • Conversion to oil fuel and the fitting of automated boiler controls over the winter of 1971–72.
  • Carried 72,000 U.S. gal (270,000 L; 60,000 imp gal) fuel oil
Propulsion: Single fixed pitch 19.5 ft (5.9 m) propeller
Speed: 14 kn (26 km/h; 16 mph)
Capacity: 25,400 tons of cargo
Crew: 29

SS Edmund Fitzgerald was an American Great Lakes freighter that sank in a Lake Superior storm on November 10, 1975, with the loss of the entire crew of 29. When launched on June 7, 1958, she was the largest ship on North America’s Great Lakes, and she remains the largest to have sunk there.

For 17 years, Edmund Fitzgerald carried taconite iron ore from mines near Duluth, Minnesota, to iron works in Detroit, Toledo, and other Great Lakes ports. As a workhorse, she set seasonal haul records six times, often breaking her own previous record. Captain Peter Pulcer was known for piping music day or night over the ship’s intercom while passing through the St. Clair and Detroit rivers (between lakes Huron and Erie), and entertaining spectators at the Soo Locks (between Lakes Superior and Huron) with a running commentary about the ship. Her size, record-breaking performance, and “DJ captain” endeared Edmund Fitzgerald to boat watchers.

Carrying a full cargo of ore pellets with Captain Ernest M. McSorley in command, she embarked on her ill-fated voyage from Superior, Wisconsin, near Duluth, on the afternoon of November 9, 1975. En route to a steel mill near Detroit, Edmund Fitzgerald joined a second taconite freighter, SS Arthur M. Anderson. By the next day, the two ships were caught in a severe storm on Lake Superior, with near hurricane-force winds and waves up to 35 feet (11 m) high. Shortly after 7:10 p.m., Edmund Fitzgerald suddenly sank in Canadian (Ontario) waters 530 feet (88 fathoms; 160 m) deep, about 17 miles (15 nautical miles; 27 kilometers) from Whitefish Bay near the twin cities of Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, and Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario—a distance Edmund Fitzgerald could have covered in just over an hour at her top speed.

Edmund Fitzgerald previously reported being in significant difficulty to Arthur M. Anderson: “I have a bad list, lost both radars. And am taking heavy seas over the deck. One of the worst seas I’ve ever been in.” However, no distress signals were sent before she sank; Captain McSorley’s last (7:10 P.M.) message to Arthur M. Anderson was, “We are holding our own.” Her crew of 29 perished, and no bodies were recovered. The exact cause of the sinking remains unknown, though many books, studies, and expeditions have examined it. Edmund Fitzgerald may have been swamped, suffered structural failure or topside damage, experienced wave shoaling, or suffered from a combination of these.

The disaster is one of the best-known in the history of Great Lakes shipping. Gordon Lightfoot made it the subject of his 1976 hit song “The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald after reading an article, “The Cruelest Month”, in the November 24, 1975, issue of Newsweek. The sinking led to changes in Great Lakes shipping regulations and practices that included mandatory survival suits, depth finders, positioning systems, increased freeboard, and more frequent inspection of vessels.

History[edit]

SS Edmund Fitzgerald upbound and in ballast

SS Edmund Fitzgerald, upbound and in ballast

Design and construction[edit]

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, invested in the iron and minerals industries on a large-scale basis, including the construction of Edmund Fitzgerald, which represented the first such investment by any American life insurance company. In 1957, they contracted Great Lakes Engineering Works (GLEW), of River Rouge, Michigan, to design and construct the ship “within a foot of the maximum length allowed for passage through the soon-to-be completed Saint Lawrence Seaway.” The ship’s value at that time was $7 million (equivalent to $49.7 million in 2019[10]). Edmund Fitzgerald was the first laker built to the maximum St. Lawrence Seaway size, which was 730 feet (222.5 m) long, 75 feet (22.9 m) wide, and with a 25 foot (7.6 m) draft. The moulded depth (roughly speaking, the vertical height of the hull) was 39 ft (12 m). The hold depth (the inside height of the cargo hold) was 33 ft 4 in (10.16 m). GLEW laid the first keel plate on August 7 the same year.

With a deadweight capacity of 26,000 long tons (29,120 short tons; 26,417 t), and a 729-foot (222 m) hull, Edmund Fitzgerald was the longest ship on the Great Lakes, earning her the title Queen of the Lakes until September 17, 1959, when the 730-foot (222.5 m) SS Murray Bay was launched.Edmund Fitzgeralds three central cargo holds were loaded through 21 watertight hatches, each 11 by 48 feet (3.4 by 14.6 m) of 516-inch-thick (7.9 mm) steel. Originally coal-fired, her boilers were converted to burn oil during the 1971–72 winter layup. In 1969, the ship’s maneuverability was improved by the installation of a diesel-powered bow thruster.

By ore freighter standards, the interior of Edmund Fitzgerald was luxurious. Her J.L. Hudson Company-designed furnishings included deep pile carpeting, tiled bathrooms, drapes over the portholes, and leather swivel chairs in the guest lounge. There were two guest staterooms for passengers. Air conditioning extended to the crew quarters, which featured more amenities than usual. A large galley and fully stocked pantry supplied meals for two dining rooms. Edmund Fitzgeralds pilothouse was outfitted with “state-of-the-art nautical equipment and a beautiful map room.”

Name and launch[edit]

Northwestern Mutual named the ship after its president and chairman of the board, Edmund Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald’s own grandfather had himself been a lake captain, and his father owned the Milwaukee Drydock Company, which built and repaired ships. More than 15,000 people attended Edmund Fitzgeralds christening and launch ceremony on June 7, 1958. The event was plagued by misfortunes. When Elizabeth Fitzgerald, wife of Edmund Fitzgerald, tried to christen the ship by smashing a champagne bottle over the bow, it took her three attempts to break it. A delay of 36 minutes followed while the shipyard crew struggled to release the keel blocks. Upon sideways launch, the ship created a large wave that “doused” the spectators and then crashed into a pier before righting herself. One man watching the launching had a heart attack and later died. Other witnesses later said they swore the ship was “trying to climb right out of the water”. On September 22, 1958, Edmund Fitzgerald completed nine days of sea trials.[23]

Career[edit]

SS Edmund Fitzgerald underway

SS Edmund Fitzgerald under way

Northwestern Mutual’s normal practice was to purchase ships for operation by other companies. In Edmund Fitzgeralds case, they signed a 25-year contract with Oglebay Norton Corporation to operate the vessel. Oglebay Norton immediately designated Edmund Fitzgerald the flagship of its Columbia Transportation fleet.

Edmund Fitzgerald was a record-setting workhorse, often beating her own milestones. The vessel’s record load for a single trip was 27,402 long tons (30,690 short tons; 27,842 t) in 1969. For 17 years, Edmund Fitzgerald carried taconite from Minnesota’s Iron Range mines near Duluth, Minnesota, to iron works in Detroit, Toledo, and other ports. She set seasonal haul records six different times. Her nicknames included “Fitz”, “Pride of the American Side”, “Mighty Fitz”, “Toledo Express”, “Big Fitz”, and the “Titanic of the Great Lakes”. Loading Edmund Fitzgerald with taconite pellets took about four and a half hours, while unloading took around 14 hours. A round trip between Superior, Wisconsin, and Detroit, Michigan, usually took her five days and she averaged 47 similar trips per season. The vessel’s usual route was between Superior, Wisconsin, and Toledo, Ohio, although her port of destination could vary. By November 1975, Edmund Fitzgerald had logged an estimated 748 round trips on the Great Lakes and covered more than a million miles, “a distance roughly equivalent to 44 trips around the world.”

Up until a few weeks before her loss, passengers had traveled on board as company guests. Frederick Stonehouse wrote:

Stewards treated the guests to the entire VIP routine. The cuisine was reportedly excellent and snacks were always available in the lounge. A small but well stocked kitchenette provided the drinks. Once each trip, the captain held a candlelight dinner for the guests, complete with mess-jacketed stewards and special “clamdigger” punch.

Because of her size, appearance, string of records, and “DJ captain,”Edmund Fitzgerald became a favorite of boat watchers throughout her career. Although Captain Peter Pulcer was in command of Edmund Fitzgerald on trips when cargo records were set, “he is best remembered … for piping music day or night over the ship’s intercom system” while passing through the St. Clair and Detroit Rivers. While navigating the Soo Locks he would often come out of the pilothouse and use a bullhorn to entertain tourists with a commentary on details about Edmund Fitzgerald.

In 1969, Edmund Fitzgerald received a safety award for eight years of operation without a time-off worker injury. The vessel ran aground in 1969, and she collided with SS Hochelaga in 1970. Later that same year, she struck the wall of a lock, an accident repeated in 1973 and 1974. During 1974, she lost her original bow anchor in the Detroit River. None of these mishaps, however, were considered serious or unusual.Freshwater ships are built to last more than half a century, and Edmund Fitzgerald should still have had a long career ahead of her when she sank.

Final voyage and wreck[edit]

Map of Fitzgerald's probable course on final voyage

The National Transportation Safety Board map of probable course of Edmund Fitzgerald and Arthur M. Anderson

Map showing the location of the wreck, with the red pointer

Edmund Fitzgerald left Superior, Wisconsin, at 2:15 p.m. on the afternoon of November 9, 1975, under the command of Captain Ernest M. McSorley. She was en route to the steel mill on Zug Island, near Detroit, Michigan, with a cargo of 26,116 long tons (29,250 short tons; 26,535 t) of taconite ore pellets and soon reached her full speed of 16.3 miles per hour (14.2 kn; 26.2 km/h). Around 5 p.m., Edmund Fitzgerald joined a second freighter under the command of Captain Jesse B. “Bernie” Cooper, Arthur M. Anderson, destined for Gary, Indiana, out of Two Harbors, Minnesota. The weather forecast was not unusual for November and the National Weather Service (NWS) predicted that a storm would pass just south of Lake Superior by 7 a.m. on November 10.

SS Wilfred Sykes loaded opposite Edmund Fitzgerald at the Burlington Northern Dock #1 and departed at 4:15 p.m., about two hours after Edmund Fitzgerald. In contrast to the NWS forecast, Captain Dudley J. Paquette of Wilfred Sykes predicted that a major storm would directly cross Lake Superior. From the outset, he chose a route that took advantage of the protection offered by the lake’s north shore to avoid the worst effects of the storm. The crew of Wilfred Sykes followed the radio conversations between Edmund Fitzgerald and Arthur M. Anderson during the first part of their trip and overheard their captains deciding to take the regular Lake Carriers’ Association downbound route. The NWS altered its forecast at 7:00 p.m., issuing gale warnings for the whole of Lake Superior.Arthur M. Anderson and Edmund Fitzgerald altered course northward seeking shelter along the Ontario shore where they encountered a winter storm at 1:00 a.m. on November 10. Edmund Fitzgerald reported winds of 52 knots (96 km/h; 60 mph) and waves 10 feet (3.0 m) high. Captain Paquette of Wilfred Sykes reported that after 1 a.m., he overheard McSorley say that he had reduced the ship’s speed because of the rough conditions. Paquette said he was stunned to later hear McSorley, who was not known for turning aside or slowing down, state that “we’re going to try for some lee from Isle Royale. You’re walking away from us anyway … I can’t stay with you.”

At 2:00 a.m. on November 10, the NWS upgraded its warnings from gale to storm, forecasting winds of 35–50 knots (65–93 km/h; 40–58 mph). Until then, Edmund Fitzgerald had followed Arthur M. Anderson, which was travelling at a constant 14.6 miles per hour (12.7 kn; 23.5 km/h), but the faster Edmund Fitzgerald pulled ahead at about 3:00 a.m. As the storm center passed over the ships, they experienced shifting winds, with wind speeds temporarily dropping as wind direction changed from northeast to south and then northwest. After 1:50 p.m., when Arthur M. Anderson logged winds of 50 knots (93 km/h; 58 mph), wind speeds again picked up rapidly, and it began to snow at 2:45 p.m., reducing visibility; Arthur M. Anderson lost sight of Edmund Fitzgerald, which was about 16 miles (26 km) ahead at the time.

Shortly after 3:30 p.m., Captain McSorley radioed Arthur M. Anderson to report that Edmund Fitzgerald was taking on water and had lost two vent covers and a fence railing. The vessel had also developed a list. Two of Edmund Fitzgeralds six bilge pumps ran continuously to discharge shipped water. McSorley said that he would slow his ship down so that Arthur M. Anderson could close the gap between them. In a broadcast shortly afterward, the United States Coast Guard (USCG) warned all shipping that the Soo Locks had been closed and they should seek safe anchorage. Shortly after 4:10 p.m., McSorley called Arthur M. Anderson again to report a radar failure and asked Arthur M. Anderson to keep track of them.Edmund Fitzgerald, effectively blind, slowed to let Arthur M. Anderson come within a 10-mile (16 km) range so she could receive radar guidance from the other ship.

For a time, Arthur M. Anderson directed Edmund Fitzgerald toward the relative safety of Whitefish Bay; then, at 4:39 p.m., McSorley contacted the USCG station in Grand Marais, Michigan, to inquire whether the Whitefish Point light and navigation beacon were operational. The USCG replied that their monitoring equipment indicated that both instruments were inactive. McSorley then hailed any ships in the Whitefish Point area to report the state of the navigational aids, receiving an answer from Captain Cedric Woodard of Avafors between 5:00 and 5:30 p.m. that the Whitefish Point light was on but not the radio beacon. Woodard testified to the Marine Board that he overheard McSorley say, “Don’t allow nobody on deck,” as well as something about a vent that Woodard could not understand. Some time later, McSorley told Woodard, “I have a ‘bad list’, I have lost both radars, and am taking heavy seas over the deck in one of the worst seas I have ever been in.”

By late in the afternoon of November 10, sustained winds of over 50 knots (93 km/h; 58 mph) were recorded by ships and observation points across eastern Lake Superior.Arthur M. Anderson logged sustained winds as high as 58 knots (107 km/h; 67 mph) at 4:52 p.m., while waves increased to as high as 25 feet (7.6 m) by 6:00 p.m.Arthur M. Anderson was also struck by 70-to-75-knot (130 to 139 km/h; 81 to 86 mph) gusts and rogue waves as high as 35 feet (11 m).

The last communication from the ship came at approximately 7:10 p.m., when Arthur M. Anderson notified Edmund Fitzgerald of an upbound ship and asked how she was doing. McSorley reported, “We are holding our own.” She sank minutes later. No distress signal was received, and ten minutes later, Arthur M. Anderson lost the ability either to reach Edmund Fitzgerald by radio or to detect her on radar.

Search[edit]

Edmund Fitzgerald lifeboat

One of Edmund Fitzgeralds lifeboats, on display at the Valley Camp museum ship

Captain Cooper of Arthur M. Anderson first called the USCG in Sault Ste. Marie at 7:39 p.m. on channel 16, the radio distress frequency. The USCG responders instructed him to call back on channel 12 because they wanted to keep their emergency channel open and they were having difficulty with their communication systems, including antennas blown down by the storm. Cooper then contacted the upbound saltwater vessel Nanfri and was told that she could not pick up Edmund Fitzgerald on her radar either. Despite repeated attempts to raise the USCG, Cooper was not successful until 7:54 p.m. when the officer on duty asked him to keep watch for a 16-foot (4.9 m) boat lost in the area. At about 8:25 p.m., Cooper again called the USCG to express his concern about Edmund Fitzgerald and at 9:03 p.m. reported her missing. Petty Officer Philip Branch later testified, “I considered it serious, but at the time it was not urgent.”

Lacking appropriate search-and-rescue vessels to respond to Edmund Fitzgeralds disaster, at approximately 9:00 p.m., the USCG asked Arthur M. Anderson to turn around and look for survivors. Around 10:30 p.m., the USCG asked all commercial vessels anchored in or near Whitefish Bay to assist in the search. The initial search for survivors was carried out by Arthur M. Anderson, and a second freighter, SS William Clay Ford. The efforts of a third freighter, the Toronto-registered SS Hilda Marjanne, were foiled by the weather. The USCG sent a buoy tender, Woodrush, from Duluth, Minnesota, but it took two and a half hours to launch and a day to travel to the search area. The Traverse City, Michigan, USCG station launched an HU-16 fixed-wing search aircraft that arrived on the scene at 10:53 p.m. while an HH-52 USCG helicopter with a 3.8-million-candlepower searchlight arrived at 1:00 a.m. on November 11.Canadian Coast Guard aircraft joined the three-day search and the Ontario Provincial Police established and maintained a beach patrol all along the eastern shore of Lake Superior.

Although the search recovered debris, including lifeboats and rafts, none of the crew were found. On her final voyage, Edmund Fitzgeralds crew of 29 consisted of the captain, the first, second and third mates, five engineers, three oilers, a cook, a wiper, two maintenance men, three watchmen, three deckhands, three wheelsmen, two porters, a cadet and a steward. Most of the crew were from Ohio and Wisconsin; their ages ranged from 20-year-old watchman Karl A. Peckol to Captain McSorley, 63 years old and planning his retirement.

Edmund Fitzgerald is among the largest and best-known vessels lost on the Great Lakes but she is not alone on the Lake Superior seabed in that area. In the years between 1816, when Invincible was lost, and 1975, when Edmund Fitzgerald sank, the Whitefish Point area had claimed at least 240 ships.

Wreck discovery and surveys[edit]

USCG drawing of wreck site

A USCG drawing of the relative positions of the wreck parts

Wreck discovery[edit]

A U.S. Navy Lockheed P-3 Orion aircraft, piloted by Lt. George Conner and equipped to detect magnetic anomalies usually associated with submarines, found the wreck on November 14, 1975. Edmund Fitzgerald lay about 15 miles (13 nmi; 24 km) west of Deadman’s Cove, Ontario, 17 miles (15 nmi; 27 km) from the entrance to Whitefish Bay to the southeast, in Canadian waters close to the international boundary at a depth of 530 feet (160 m). A further November 14–16 survey by the USCG using a side scan sonar revealed two large objects lying close together on the lake floor. The U.S. Navy also contracted Seaward, Inc., to conduct a second survey between November 22 and 25.

Underwater surveys[edit]

From May 20 to 28, 1976, the U.S. Navy dived on the wreck using its unmanned submersible, CURV-III, and found Edmund Fitzgerald lying in two large pieces in 530 feet (160 m) of water. Navy estimates put the length of the bow section at 276 feet (84 m) and that of the stern section at 253 feet (77 m). The bow section stood upright in the mud, some 170 feet (52 m) from the stern section that lay capsized at a 50-degree angle from the bow. In between the two broken sections lay a large mass of taconite pellets and scattered wreckage lying about, including hatch covers and hull plating.

In 1980, during a Lake Superior research dive expedition, marine explorer Jean-Michel Cousteau, the son of Jacques Cousteau, sent two divers from RV Calypso in the first manned submersible dive to Edmund Fitzgerald. The dive was brief, and although the dive team drew no final conclusions, they speculated that Edmund Fitzgerald had broken up on the surface.

The Michigan Sea Grant Program organized a three-day dive to survey Edmund Fitzgerald in 1989. The primary objective was to record 3-D videotape for use in museum educational programs and production of documentaries. The expedition used a towed survey system (TSS Mk1) and a self-propelled, tethered, free swimming remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV). The Mini Rover ROV was equipped with miniature stereoscopic cameras and wide angle lenses in order to produce 3-D images. The towed survey system and the Mini Rover ROV were designed, built and operated by Chris Nicholson of Deep Sea Systems International, Inc. Participants included the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the National Geographic Society, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Great Lakes Shipwreck Historical Society (GLSHS), and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the latter providing RV Grayling as the support vessel for the ROV. The GLSHS used part of the five hours of video footage produced during the dives in a documentary and the National Geographic Society used a segment in a broadcast. Frederick Stonehouse, who wrote one of the first books on the Edmund Fitzgerald wreck, moderated a 1990 panel review of the video that drew no conclusions about the cause of Edmund Fitzgeralds sinking.

Canadian explorer Joseph B. MacInnis organized and led six publicly funded dives to Edmund Fitzgerald over a three-day period in 1994.Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution provided Edwin A. Link as the support vessel, and their manned submersible, Celia. The GLSHS paid $10,000 for three of its members to each join a dive and take still pictures. MacInnis concluded that the notes and video obtained during the dives did not provide an explanation why Edmund Fitzgerald sank. The same year, longtime sport diver Fred Shannon formed Deepquest Ltd., and organized a privately funded dive to the wreck of Edmund Fitzgerald, using Delta Oceanographic’s submersible, Delta. Deepquest Ltd. conducted seven dives and took more than 42 hours of underwater video while Shannon set the record for the longest submersible dive to Edmund Fitzgerald at 211 minutes. Prior to conducting the dives, Shannon studied NOAA navigational charts and found that the international boundary had changed three times before its publication by NOAA in 1976. Shannon determined that based on GPS coordinates from the 1994 Deepquest expedition, “at least one-third of the two acres of immediate wreckage containing the two major portions of the vessel is in U.S. waters because of an error in the position of the U.S.–Canada boundary line shown on official lake charts.”

Shannon’s group discovered the remains of a crew member partly dressed in coveralls and wearing a life jacket lying face up on the lake bottom alongside the bow of the ship, indicating that at least one of the crew was aware of the possibility of sinking. The life jacket had deteriorated canvas and “what is thought to be six rectangular cork blocks … clearly visible.” Shannon concluded that “massive and advancing structural failure” caused Edmund Fitzgerald to break apart on the surface and sink.

MacInnis led another series of dives in 1995 to salvage the bell from Edmund Fitzgerald. The Sault Tribe of Chippewa Indians backed the expedition by co-signing a loan in the amount of $250,000.[87] Canadian engineer Phil Nuytten‘s atmospheric diving suit, known as the “Newtsuit,” was used to retrieve the bell from the ship, replace it with a replica, and put a beer can in Edmund Fitzgeralds pilothouse. That same year, Terrence Tysall and Mike Zee set multiple records when they used trimix gas to scuba dive to Edmund Fitzgerald. The pair are the only people known to have touched the Edmund Fitzgerald wreck. They also set records for the deepest scuba dive on the Great Lakes and the deepest shipwreck dive, and were the first divers to reach Edmund Fitzgerald without the aid of a submersible. It took six minutes to reach the wreck, six minutes to survey it, and three hours to resurface to avoid decompression sickness, also known as “the bends.”

Restrictions on surveys[edit]

Under the Ontario Heritage Act, activities on registered archeological sites require a license. In March 2005, the Whitefish Point Preservation Society accused the Great Lakes Shipwreck Historical Society (GLSHS) of conducting an unauthorized dive to Edmund Fitzgerald. Although the director of the GLSHS admitted to conducting a sonar scan of the wreck in 2002, he denied such a survey required a license at the time it was carried out.

An April 2005 amendment to the Ontario Heritage Act allows the Ontario government to impose a license requirement on dives, the operation of submersibles, side scan sonars or underwater cameras within a designated radius around protected sites. Conducting any of those activities without a license would result in fines of up to CA$1 million. On the basis of the amended law, to protect wreck sites considered “watery graves”, the Ontario government issued updated regulations in January 2006, including an area with a 500-meter (1,640 ft) radius around Edmund Fitzgerald and other specifically designated marine archeological sites. In 2009, a further amendment to the Ontario Heritage Act imposed licensing requirements on any type of surveying device.

Hypotheses on the cause of sinking[edit]

Extreme weather and sea conditions play a role in all of the published hypotheses regarding Edmund Fitzgeralds sinking, but they differ on the other causal factors.

Waves and weather hypothesis[edit]

In 2005 NOAA and the NWS ran a computer simulation, including weather and wave conditions, covering the period from November 9, 1975, until the early morning of November 11. Analysis of the simulation showed that two separate areas of high wind appeared over Lake Superior at 4:00 p.m. on November 10. One had speeds in excess of 43 knots (80 km/h; 49 mph) and the other winds in excess of 40 knots (74 km/h; 46 mph). The southeastern part of the lake, the direction in which Edmund Fitzgerald was heading, had the highest winds. Average wave heights increased to near 19 feet (5.8 m) by 7:00 p.m., November 10, and winds exceeded 50 mph (43 kn; 80 km/h) over most of southeastern Lake Superior.

Edmund Fitzgerald sank at the eastern edge of the area of high wind where the long fetch, or distance that wind blows over water, produced significant waves averaging over 23 feet (7.0 m) by 7:00 p.m. and over 25 feet (7.6 m) at 8:00 p.m. The simulation also showed one in 100 waves reaching 36 feet (11 m) and one out of every 1,000 reaching 46 feet (14 m). Since the ship was heading east-southeastward, it is likely that the waves caused Edmund Fitzgerald to roll heavily.

At the time of the sinking, the ship Arthur M. Anderson reported northwest winds of 57 mph (50 kn; 92 km/h), matching the simulation analysis result of 54 mph (47 kn; 87 km/h). The analysis further showed that the maximum sustained winds reached near hurricane force of about 70 mph (61 kn; 110 km/h) with gusts to 86 miles per hour (75 kn; 138 km/h) at the time and location where Edmund Fitzgerald sank.

Rogue wave hypothesis[edit]

A group of three rogue waves, often called “three sisters,” was reported in the vicinity of Edmund Fitzgerald at the time she sank. The “three sisters” phenomenon is said to occur on Lake Superior as a result of a sequence of three rogue waves forming that are one-third larger than normal waves. The first wave introduces an abnormally large amount of water onto the deck. This water is unable to fully drain away before the second wave strikes, adding to the surplus. The third incoming wave again adds to the two accumulated backwashes, quickly overloading the deck with too much water.

Captain Cooper of Arthur M. Anderson reported that his ship was “hit by two 30 to 35 foot seas about 6:30 p.m., one burying the aft cabins and damaging a lifeboat by pushing it right down onto the saddle. The second wave of this size, perhaps 35 foot, came over the bridge deck.” Cooper went on to say that these two waves, possibly followed by a third, continued in the direction of Edmund Fitzgerald and would have struck about the time she sank. This hypothesis postulates that the “three sisters” compounded the twin problems of Edmund Fitzgeralds known list and her lower speed in heavy seas that already allowed water to remain on her deck for longer than usual.

The “Edmund Fitzgerald” episode of the 2010 television series Dive Detectives features the wave-generating tank of the National Research Council‘s Institute for Naval Technology in St. John’s, and the tank’s simulation of the effect of a 17-meter (56 ft) rogue wave upon a scale model of Edmund Fitzgerald. The simulation indicated such a rogue wave could almost completely submerge the bow or stern of the ship with water, at least temporarily.

Cargo-hold flooding hypothesis[edit]

The July 26, 1977, USCG Marine Casualty Report suggested that the accident was caused by ineffective hatch closures. The report concluded that these devices failed to prevent waves from inundating the cargo hold. The flooding occurred gradually and probably imperceptibly throughout the final day, finally resulting in a fatal loss of buoyancy and stability. As a result, Edmund Fitzgerald plummeted to the bottom without warning. Video footage of the wreck site showed that most of her hatch clamps were in perfect condition. The USCG Marine board concluded that the few damaged clamps were probably the only ones fastened. As a result, ineffective hatch closure caused Edmund Fitzgerald to flood and founder.

From the beginning of the USCG inquiry, some of the crewmen’s families and various labor organizations believed the USCG findings could be tainted because there were serious questions regarding their preparedness as well as licensing and rules changes. Paul Trimble, a retired USCG vice admiral and president of the Lake Carriers Association (LCA), wrote a letter to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on September 16, 1977, that included the following statements of objection to the USCG findings:

The present hatch covers are an advanced design and are considered by the entire lake shipping industry to be the most significant improvement over the telescoping leaf covers previously used for many years … The one-piece hatch covers have proven completely satisfactory in all weather conditions without a single vessel loss in almost 40 years of use … and no water accumulation in cargo holds …

It was common practice for ore freighters, even in foul weather, to embark with not all cargo clamps locked in place on the hatch covers. Maritime author Wolff reported that depending on weather conditions, all the clamps were eventually set within one to two days. Captain Paquette of Wilfred Sykes was dismissive of suggestions that unlocked hatch clamps caused Edmund Fitzgerald to founder. He said that he commonly sailed in fine weather using the minimum number of clamps necessary to secure the hatch covers.

The May 4, 1978, NTSB findings differed from the USCG. The NTSB made the following observations based on the CURV-III survey:

The No. 1 hatch cover was entirely inside the No. 1 hatch and showed indications of buckling from external loading. Sections of the coaming in way of the No. 1 hatch were fractured and buckled inward. The No. 2 hatch cover was missing and the coaming on the No. 2 hatch was fractured and buckled. Hatches Nos. 3 and 4 were covered with mud; one corner of hatch cover No. 3 could be seen in place. Hatch cover No. 5 was missing. A series of 16 consecutive hatch cover clamps were observed on the No. 5 hatch coaming. Of this series, the first and eighth were distorted or broken. All of the 14 other clamps were undamaged and in the open position. The No. 6 hatch was open and a hatch cover was standing on end vertically in the hatch. The hatch covers were missing from hatches Nos. 7 and 8 and both coamings were fractured and severely distorted. The bow section abruptly ended just aft of hatch No. 8 and the deck plating was ripped up from the separation to the forward end of hatch No. 7.

The NTSB conducted computer studies, testing and analysis to determine the forces necessary to collapse the hatch covers and concluded that Edmund Fitzgerald sank suddenly from flooding of the cargo hold “due to the collapse of one or more of the hatch covers under the weight of giant boarding seas” instead of flooding gradually due to ineffective hatch closures. The NTSB dissenting opinion held that Edmund Fitzgerald sank suddenly and unexpectedly from shoaling.

Shoaling hypothesis[edit]

The LCA believed that instead of hatch cover leakage, the more probable cause of Edmund Fitzgeralds loss was shoaling or grounding in the Six Fathom Shoal northwest of Caribou Island when the vessel “unknowingly raked a reef” during the time the Whitefish Point light and radio beacon were not available as navigation aids. This hypothesis was supported by a 1976 Canadian hydrographic survey, which disclosed that an unknown shoal ran a mile further east of Six Fathom Shoal than shown on the Canadian charts. Officers from Arthur M. Anderson observed that Edmund Fitzgerald sailed through this exact area. Conjecture by proponents of the Six Fathom Shoal hypothesis concluded that Edmund Fitzgeralds downed fence rail reported by McSorley could occur only if the ship “hogged” during shoaling, with the bow and stern bent downward and the midsection raised by the shoal, pulling the railing tight until the cables dislodged or tore under the strain. Divers searched the Six Fathom Shoal after the wreck occurred and found no evidence of “a recent collision or grounding anywhere.” Maritime authors Bishop and Stonehouse wrote that the shoaling hypothesis was later challenged on the basis of the higher quality of detail in Shannon’s 1994 photography that “explicitly show[s] the devastation of the Edmund Fitzgerald“. Shannon’s photography of Edmund Fitzgeralds overturned stern showed “no evidence on the bottom of the stern, the propeller or the rudder of the ship that would indicate the ship struck a shoal.”

Maritime author Stonehouse reasoned that “unlike the Lake Carriers, the Coast Guard had no vested interest in the outcome of their investigation.” Author Bishop reported that Captain Paquette of Wilfred Sykes argued that through their support for the shoaling explanation, the LCA represented the shipping company’s interests by advocating a hypothesis that held LCA member companies, the American Bureau of Shipping, and the U.S. Coast Guard Service blameless.

Paul Hainault, a retired professor of mechanical engineering from Michigan Technological University, promoted a hypothesis that began as a student class project. His hypothesis held that Edmund Fitzgerald grounded at 9:30 a.m. on November 10 on Superior Shoal. This shoal, charted in 1929, is an underwater mountain in the middle of Lake Superior about 50 miles (80 km) north of Copper Harbor, Michigan. It has sharp peaks that rise nearly to the lake surface with water depths ranging from 22 to 400 feet (6.7 to 121.9 m), making it a menace to navigation. Discovery of the shoal resulted in a change in recommended shipping routes. A seiche, or standing wave, that occurred during the low-pressure system over Lake Superior on November 10, 1975, caused the lake to rise 3 feet (0.91 m) over the Soo Locks’s gates to flood Portage Avenue in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, with 1 foot (0.3 m) of water. Hainault’s hypothesis held that this seiche contributed to Edmund Fitzgerald shoaling 200 feet (61 m) of her hull on Superior Shoal, causing the hull to be punctured mid-body. The hypothesis contended that the wave action continued to damage the hull, until the middle third dropped out like a box, leaving the ship held together by the center deck. The stern section acted as an anchor and caused Edmund Fitzgerald to come to a full stop, causing everything to go forward. The ship broke apart on the surface within seconds. Compressed air pressure blew a hole in the starboard bow, which sank 18 degrees off course. The rear kept going forward with the engine still running, rolled to port and landed bottom up.

Structural failure hypothesis[edit]

Another published hypothesis contends that an already weakened structure, and modification of Edmund Fitzgeralds winter load line (which allows heavier loading and travel lower in the water), made it possible for large waves to cause a stress fracture in the hull. This is based on the “regular” huge waves of the storm and does not necessarily involve rogue waves.

The USCG and NTSB investigated whether Edmund Fitzgerald broke apart due to structural failure of the hull and because the 1976 CURV III survey found Edmund Fitzgeralds sections were 170 feet (52 m) from each other, the USCG’s formal casualty report of July 1977 concluded that she had separated upon hitting the lake floor. The NTSB came to the same conclusion as USCG because:

The proximity of the bow and stern sections on the bottom of Lake Superior indicated that the vessel sank in one piece and broke apart either when it hit bottom or as it descended. Therefore, Edmund Fitzgerald did not sustain a massive structural failure of the hull while on the surface … The final position of the wreckage indicated that if the Edmund Fitzgerald had capsized, it must have suffered a structural failure before hitting the lake bottom. The bow section would have had to right itself and the stern portion would have had to capsize before coming to rest on the bottom. It is, therefore, concluded that the Edmund Fitzgerald did not capsize on the surface.

Other authors have concluded that Edmund Fitzgerald most likely broke in two on the surface before sinking due to the intense waves, like the ore carriers SS Carl D. Bradley and SS Daniel J. Morrell.[126][127][128] After maritime historian Frederick Stonehouse moderated the panel reviewing the video footage from the 1989 ROV survey of Edmund Fitzgerald, he concluded that the extent of taconite coverage over the wreck site showed that the stern had floated on the surface for a short time and spilled taconite into the forward section; thus the two sections of the wreck did not sink at the same time. The 1994 Shannon team found that the stern and the bow were 255 feet (78 m) apart, leading Shannon to conclude that Edmund Fitzgerald broke up on the surface. He said:

This placement does not support the hypothesis that the ship plunged to the bottom in one piece, breaking apart when it struck bottom. If this were true, the two sections would be much closer. In addition, the angle, repose and mounding of clay and mud at the site indicate the stern rolled over on the surface, spilling taconite ore pellets from its severed cargo hold, and then landed on portions of the cargo itself.

The stress fracture hypothesis was supported by the testimony of former crewmen. Former Second Mate Richard Orgel, who served on Edmund Fitzgerald in 1972 and 1973, testified that “the ship had a tendency to bend and spring during storms ‘like a diving board after somebody has jumped off.” Orgel was quoted as saying that the loss of Edmund Fitzgerald was caused by hull failure, “pure and simple. I detected undue stress in the side tunnels by examining the white enamel paint, which will crack and splinter when submitted to severe stress.” George H. “Red” Burgner, Edmund Fitzgeralds steward for ten seasons and winter ship-keeper for seven years, testified in a deposition that a “loose keel” contributed to the vessel’s loss. Burgner further testified that “the keel and sister kelsons were only ‘tack welded'” and that he had personally observed that many of the welds were broken. Burgner was not asked to testify before the Marine Board of Inquiry.

When Bethlehem Steel Corporation permanently laid up Edmund Fitzgeralds sister ship, SS Arthur B. Homer, just five years after going to considerable expense to lengthen her, questions were raised as to whether both ships had the same structural problems. The two vessels were built in the same shipyard using welded joints instead of the riveted joints used in older ore freighters. Riveted joints allow a ship to flex and work in heavy seas, while welded joints are more likely to break. Reports indicate that repairs to Edmund Fitzgeralds hull were delayed in 1975 due to plans to lengthen the ship during the upcoming winter layup. Arthur B. Homer was lengthened to 825 feet (251 m) and placed back in service by December 1975, not long after Edmund Fitzgerald foundered. In 1978, without explanation, Bethlehem Steel Corporation denied permission for the chairman of the NTSB to travel on Arthur B. Homer. Arthur B. Homer was permanently laid up in 1980 and broken for scrap in 1987.

Retired GLEW naval architect Raymond Ramsay, one of the members of the design team that worked on the hull of Edmund Fitzgerald, reviewed her increased load lines, maintenance history, along with the history of long ship hull failure and concluded that Edmund Fitzgerald was not seaworthy on November 10, 1975. He stated that planning Edmund Fitzgerald to be compatible with the constraints of the St. Lawrence Seaway had placed her hull design in a “straight jacket [sic?].”Edmund Fitzgeralds long-ship design was developed without the benefit of research, development, test, and evaluation principles while computerized analytical technology was not available at the time she was built. Ramsay noted that Edmund Fitzgeralds hull was built with an all-welded (instead of riveted) modular fabrication method, which was used for the first time in the GLEW shipyard. Ramsay concluded that increasing the hull length to 729 feet (222 m) resulted in an L/D slenderness ratio (the ratio of the length of the ship to the depth of her structure) that caused excessive multi-axial bending and springing of the hull, and that the hull should have been structurally reinforced to cope with her increased length.

Topside damage hypothesis[edit]

The USCG cited topside damage as a reasonable alternative reason for Edmund Fitzgerald sinking and surmised that damage to the fence rail and vents was possibly caused by a heavy floating object such as a log. Historian and mariner Mark Thompson believes that something broke loose from Edmund Fitzgeralds deck. He theorized that the loss of the vents resulted in flooding of two ballast tanks or a ballast tank and a walking tunnel that caused the ship to list. Thompson further conjectured that damage more extensive than Captain McSorley could detect in the pilothouse let water flood the cargo hold. He concluded that the topside damage Edmund Fitzgerald experienced at 3:30 p.m. on November 10, compounded by the heavy seas, was the most obvious explanation for why she sank.

Possible contributing factors[edit]

The USCG, NTSB, and proponents of alternative theories have all named multiple possible contributing factors to the foundering of Edmund Fitzgerald.

Scale mode of Fitzgerald

A scale model of SS Edmund Fitzgerald

Weather forecasting[edit]

The NWS long range forecast on November 9, 1975, predicted that a storm would pass just south of Lake Superior and over the Keweenaw Peninsula, extending into the Lake from Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. Captain Paquette of Wilfred Sykes had been following and charting the low pressure system over Oklahoma since November 8 and concluded that a major storm would track across eastern Lake Superior. He therefore chose a route that gave Wilfred Sykes the most protection and took refuge in Thunder Bay, Ontario, during the worst of the storm. Based on the NWS forecast, Arthur M. Anderson and Edmund Fitzgerald instead started their trip across Lake Superior following the regular Lake Carriers Association route, which placed them in the path of the storm. The NTSB investigation concluded that the NWS failed to accurately predict wave heights on November 10. After running computer models in 2005 using actual meteorological data from November 10, 1975, Hultquist of the NWS said of Edmund Fitzgeralds position in the storm, “It ended in precisely the wrong place at the absolute worst time.”

Inaccurate navigational charts[edit]

After reviewing testimony that Edmund Fitzgerald had passed near shoals north of Caribou Island, the USCG Marine Board examined the relevant navigational charts. They found that the Canadian 1973 navigational chart for the Six Fathom Shoal area was based on Canadian surveys from 1916 and 1919 and that the 1973 U.S. Lake Survey Chart No. 9 included the notation, “Canadian Areas. For data concerning Canadian areas, Canadian authorities have been consulted.” Thereafter, at the request of the Marine Board and the Commander of the USCG Ninth District, the Canadian Hydrographic Service conducted a survey of the area surrounding Michipicoten Island and Caribou Island in 1976. The survey revealed that the shoal ran about 1 mile (1.6 km) further east than shown on Canadian charts. The NTSB investigation concluded that, at the time of Edmund Fitzgeralds foundering, Lake Survey Chart No. 9 was not detailed enough to indicate Six Fathom Shoal as a hazard to navigation.

Lack of watertight bulkheads[edit]

Mark Thompson, a merchant seaman and author of numerous books on Great Lakes shipping, stated that if her cargo holds had watertight subdivisions, “the Edmund Fitzgerald could have made it into Whitefish Bay.” Frederick Stonehouse also held that the lack of watertight bulkheads caused Edmund Fitzgerald to sink. He said:

The Great Lakes ore carrier is the most commercially efficient vessel in the shipping trade today. But it’s nothing but a motorized barge! It’s the unsafest commercial vessel afloat. It has virtually no watertight integrity. Theoretically, a one-inch puncture in the cargo hold will sink it.

Stonehouse called on ship designers and builders to design lake carriers more like ships rather than “motorized super-barges” making the following comparison:

Contrast this [the Edmund Fitzgerald] with the story of the SS Maumee, an oceangoing tanker that struck an iceberg near the South Pole recently. The collision tore a hole in the ship’s bow large enough to drive a truck through, but the Maumee was able to travel halfway around the world to a repair yard, without difficulty, because she was fitted with watertight bulkheads.

After Edmund Fitzgerald foundered, Great Lakes shipping companies were accused of valuing cargo payloads more than human life, since the vessel’s cargo hold of 860,950 cubic feet (24,379 m3) had been divided by two non-watertight traverse “screen” bulkheads. The NTSB Edmund Fitzgerald investigation concluded that Great Lakes freighters should be constructed with watertight bulkheads in their cargo holds.

The USCG had proposed rules for watertight bulkheads in Great Lakes vessels as early as the sinking of Daniel J. Morrell in 1966 and did so again after the sinking of Edmund Fitzgerald, arguing that this would allow ships to make it to refuge or at least allow crew members to abandon ship in an orderly fashion. The LCA represented the Great Lakes fleet owners and was able to forestall watertight subdivision regulations by arguing that this would cause economic hardship for vessel operators. A few vessel operators have built Great Lakes ships with watertight subdivisions in the cargo holds since 1975, but most vessels operating on the lakes cannot prevent flooding of the entire cargo hold area.

Lack of instrumentation[edit]

A fathometer was not required under USCG regulations, and Edmund Fitzgerald lacked one, even though fathometers were available at the time of her sinking. Instead, a hand line was the only method Edmund Fitzgerald had to take depth soundings. The hand line consisted of a piece of line knotted at measured intervals with a lead weight on the end. The line was thrown over the bow of the ship and the count of the knots measured the water depth. The NTSB investigation concluded that a fathometer would have provided Edmund Fitzgerald additional navigational data and made her less dependent on Arthur M. Anderson for navigational assistance.

Edmund Fitzgerald had no system to monitor the presence or amount of water in her cargo hold, even though there was always some present. The intensity of the November 10 storm would have made it difficult, if not impossible, to access the hatches from the spar deck (deck over the cargo holds). The USCG Marine Board found that flooding of the hold could not have been assessed until the water reached the top of the taconite cargo. The NTSB investigation concluded that it would have been impossible to pump water from the hold when it was filled with bulk cargo. The Marine Board noted that because Edmund Fitzgerald lacked a draft-reading system, the crew had no way to determine whether the vessel had lost freeboard (the level of a ship’s deck above the water).

Increased load lines, reduced freeboard[edit]

The USCG increased Edmund Fitzgeralds load line in 1969, 1971, and 1973 to allow 3 feet 3.25 inches (997 mm) less minimum freeboard than Edmund Fitzgeralds original design allowed in 1958. This meant that Edmund Fitzgeralds deck was only 11.5 feet (3.5 m) above the water when she faced 35-foot (11 m) waves during the November 10 storm. Captain Paquette of Wilfred Sykes noted that this change allowed loading to 4,000 tons more than what Edmund Fitzgerald was designed to carry.

Concerns regarding Edmund Fitzgeralds keel-welding problem surfaced during the time the USCG started increasing her load line. This increase and the resultant reduction in freeboard decreased the vessel’s critical reserve buoyancy. Prior to the load-line increases she was said to be a “good riding ship” but afterwards Edmund Fitzgerald became a sluggish ship with slower response and recovery times. Captain McSorley said he did not like the action of a ship he described as a “wiggling thing” that scared him. Edmund Fitzgeralds bow hooked to one side or the other in heavy seas without recovering and made a groaning sound not heard on other ships.

Maintenance[edit]

NTSB investigators noted that Edmund Fitzgeralds prior groundings could have caused undetected damage that led to major structural failure during the storm, since Great Lakes vessels were normally drydocked for inspection only once every five years. It was also alleged that when compared to Edmund Fitzgeralds previous captain, McSorley did not keep up with routine maintenance and did not confront the mates about getting the requisite work done. After August B. Herbel, Jr., president of the American Society for Testing and Materials, examined photographs of the welds on Edmund Fitzgerald, he stated, “the hull was just being held together with patching plates.” Other questions were raised as to why the USCG did not discover and take corrective action in its pre-November 1975 inspection of Edmund Fitzgerald, given that her hatch coamings, gaskets, and clamps were poorly maintained.

Complacency[edit]

On the fateful evening of November 10, 1975, McSorley reported he had never seen bigger seas in his life. Paquette, master of Wilfred Sykes, out in the same storm, said, “I’ll tell anyone that it was a monster sea washing solid water over the deck of every vessel out there.” The USCG did not broadcast that all ships should seek safe anchorage until after 3:35 p.m. on November 10, many hours after the weather was upgraded from a gale to a storm.

McSorley was known as a “heavy weather captain” who ‘beat hell’ out of the Edmund Fitzgerald and ‘very seldom ever hauled up for weather“. Paquette held the opinion that negligence caused Edmund Fitzgerald to founder. He said, “in my opinion, all the subsequent events arose because (McSorley) kept pushing that ship and didn’t have enough training in weather forecasting to use common sense and pick a route out of the worst of the wind and seas.” Paquette’s vessel was the first to reach a discharge port after the November 10 storm; she was met by company attorneys who came aboard Sykes. He told them that Edmund Fitzgeralds foundering was caused by negligence. Paquette was never asked to testify during the USCG or NTSB investigations.

The NTSB investigation noted that Great Lakes cargo vessels could normally avoid severe storms and called for the establishment of a limiting sea state applicable to Great Lakes bulk cargo vessels. This would restrict the operation of vessels in sea states above the limiting value. One concern was that shipping companies pressured the captains to deliver cargo as quickly and cheaply as possible regardless of bad weather. At the time of Edmund Fitzgeralds foundering, there was no evidence that any governmental regulatory agency tried to control vessel movement in foul weather, despite the historical record that hundreds of Great Lakes vessels had been wrecked in storms. The USCG took the position that only the captain could decide when it was safe to sail.

The USCG Marine Board issued the following conclusion:

The nature of Great Lakes shipping, with short voyages, much of the time in very protected waters, frequently with the same routine from trip to trip, leads to complacency and an overly optimistic attitude concerning the extreme weather conditions that can and do exist. The Marine Board feels that this attitude reflects itself at times in deferral of maintenance and repairs, in failure to prepare properly for heavy weather, and in the conviction that since refuges are near, safety is possible by “running for it.” While it is true that sailing conditions are good during the summer season, changes can occur abruptly, with severe storms and extreme weather and sea conditions arising rapidly. This tragic accident points out the need for all persons involved in Great Lakes shipping to foster increased awareness of the hazards which exist.

Mark Thompson countered that “the Coast Guard laid bare [its] own complacency” by blaming the sinking of Edmund Fitzgerald on industry-wide complacency, since it had inspected Edmund Fitzgerald just two weeks before she sank. The loss of Edmund Fitzgerald also exposed the USCG’s lack of rescue capability on Lake Superior. Thompson said that ongoing budget cuts had limited the USCG’s ability to perform its historical functions. He further noted that USCG rescue vessels were unlikely to reach the scene of an incident on Lake Superior or Lake Huron within 6 to 12 hours of its occurrence.

Legal settlement[edit]

Under maritime law, ships fall under the jurisdiction of the admiralty courts of their flag country. As Edmund Fitzgerald was sailing under the U.S. flag, even though she sank in foreign (Canadian) waters, she was subject to U.S. admiralty law. With a value of $24 million, Edmund Fitzgeralds financial loss was the greatest in Great Lakes sailing history. In addition to the crew, 26,116 long tons (29,250 short tons; 26,535 t) of taconite sank along with the vessel. Two widows of crewmen filed a $1.5 million lawsuit against Edmund Fitzgeralds owners, Northwestern Mutual, and its operators, Oglebay Norton Corporation, one week after she sank. An additional $2.1 million lawsuit was later filed. Oglebay Norton subsequently filed a petition in the U.S. District Court seeking to “limit their liability to $817,920 in connection with other suits filed by families of crew members.” The company paid compensation to surviving families about 12 months in advance of official findings of the probable cause and on condition of imposed confidentiality agreements. Robert Hemming, a reporter and newspaper editor, reasoned in his book about Edmund Fitzgerald that the USCG’s conclusions “were benign in placing blame on [n]either the company or the captain … [and] saved the Oglebay Norton from very expensive lawsuits by the families of the lost crew.”

Subsequent changes to Great Lakes shipping practice[edit]

The USCG investigation of Edmund Fitzgeralds sinking resulted in 15 recommendations regarding load lines, weathertight integrity, search and rescue capability, lifesaving equipment, crew training, loading manuals, and providing information to masters of Great Lakes vessels. NTSB’s investigation resulted in 19 recommendations for the USCG, four recommendations for the American Bureau of Shipping, and two recommendations for NOAA. Of the official recommendations, the following actions and USCG regulations were put in place:

1. In 1977, the USCG made it a requirement that all vessels of 1,600 gross register tons and over use depth finders.
2. Since 1980, survival suits have been required aboard ship in each crew member’s quarters and at their customary work station with strobe lights affixed to life jackets and survival suits.
3. A LORAN-C positioning system for navigation on the Great Lakes was implemented in 1980 and later replaced with Global Positioning System (GPS) in the 1990s.
4. Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRBs) are installed on all Great Lakes vessels for immediate and accurate location in event of a disaster.
5. Navigational charts for northeastern Lake Superior were improved for accuracy and greater detail.
6. NOAA revised its method for predicting wave heights.
7. The USCG rescinded the 1973 Load Line Regulation amendment that permitted reduced freeboard loadings.
8. The USCG began the annual pre-November inspection program recommended by the NTSB. “Coast Guard inspectors now board all U.S. ships during the fall to inspect hatch and vent closures and lifesaving equipment.”

Karl Bohnak, an Upper Peninsula meteorologist, covered the sinking and storm in a book on local weather history. In this book, Joe Warren, a deckhand on Arthur M. Anderson during the November 10, 1975, storm, said that the storm changed the way things were done. He stated, “After that, trust me, when a gale came up we dropped the hook [anchor]. We dropped the hook because they found out the big ones could sink.” Mark Thompson wrote, “Since the loss of the Fitz, some captains may be more prone to go to anchor, rather than venturing out in a severe storm, but there are still too many who like to portray themselves as ‘heavy weather sailors.'”

Memorials[edit]

Edmund Fitzgerald Memorial at Whitefish Point

Bell from Edmund Fitzgerald

The bell from Edmund Fitzgerald on display at the Great Lakes Shipwreck Museum

Edmund Fitzgerald bow anchor

Edmund Fitzgerald bow anchor on display at the Dossin Great Lakes Museum

The day after the wreck, Mariners’ Church in Detroit rang its bell 29 times; once for each life lost. The church continued to hold an annual memorial, reading the names of the crewmen and ringing the church bell, until 2006 when the church broadened its memorial ceremony to commemorate all lives lost on the Great Lakes.[189]

The ship’s bell was recovered from the wreck on July 4, 1995. A replica engraved with the names of the 29 sailors who lost their lives replaced the original on the wreck. A legal document signed by 46 relatives of the deceased, officials of the Mariners’ Church of Detroit and the Great Lakes Shipwreck Historic Society (GLSHS) “donated the custodian and conservatorship” of the bell to the GLSHS “to be incorporated in a permanent memorial at Whitefish Point, Michigan, to honor the memory of the 29 men of the SS Edmund Fitzgerald.” The terms of the legal agreement made the GLSHS responsible for maintaining the bell, and forbade it from selling or moving the bell or using it for commercial purposes. It provided for transferring the bell to the Mariners’ Church of Detroit if the terms were violated.

An uproar occurred in 1995 when a maintenance worker in St. Ignace, Michigan, refurbished the bell by stripping the protective coating applied by Michigan State University experts. The controversy continued when the Great Lakes Shipwreck Museum tried to use the bell as a touring exhibit in 1996. Relatives of the crew halted this move, objecting that the bell was being used as a “traveling trophy.” As of 2005, the bell is on display in the Great Lakes Shipwreck Museum in Whitefish Point near Paradise, Michigan.

An anchor from Edmund Fitzgerald lost on an earlier trip was recovered from the Detroit River and is on display at the Dossin Great Lakes Museum in Detroit, Michigan. The Dossin Great Lakes Museum also hosts a Lost Mariners Remembrance event each year on the evening of November 10. Artifacts on display in the Steamship Valley Camp museum in Sault Ste. Marie, include two lifeboats, photos, a movie of Edmund Fitzgerald and commemorative models and paintings. Every November 10, the Split Rock Lighthouse in Silver Bay, Minnesota emits a light in honor of Edmund Fitzgerald.

On August 8, 2007, along a remote shore of Lake Superior on the Keweenaw Peninsula, a Michigan family discovered a lone life-saving ring that appeared to have come from Edmund Fitzgerald. It bore markings different from those of rings found at the wreck site, and was thought to be a hoax. Later it was determined that the life ring was not from Edmund Fitzgerald, but had been lost by the owner, whose father had made it as a personal memorial.

The Royal Canadian Mint commemorated Edmund Fitzgerald in 2015 with a colored silver collector coin, with a face value of $20.[198]

Musical and theater tributes[edit]

In 1976, Ontario singer-songwriter Gordon Lightfoot wrote, composed, and recorded the song “The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald” for his album Summertime Dream. On NPR’s Saturday Morning Edition on February 14, 2015, Gordon Lightfoot said he was inspired to write the song when he saw the name misspelled “Edmond” in Newsweek magazine two weeks after the sinking; Lightfoot said he felt that it dishonored the memory of the 29 who died. Lightfoot’s popular ballad made the sinking of Edmund Fitzgerald one of the better-known disasters in the history of Great Lakes shipping. The original lyrics of the song show a degree of artistic license compared to the events of the actual sinking: it states the destination as Cleveland instead of Detroit. Also, in light of new evidence about what happened, Lightfoot has modified one line for live performances, the original stanza being:

When suppertime came the old cook came on deck,

Saying ‘Fellas, it’s too rough to feed ya.’

At 7 p.m. a main hatchway caved in,

He said, ‘Fellas, it’s been good to know ya.’

Lightfoot changed the third line to “At 7 p.m. it grew dark, it was then”.

In 1986, writer Steven Dietz and songwriter/lyricist Eric Peltoniemi wrote the musical Ten November in memory of Edmund Fitzgeralds sinking. In 2005, the play was re-edited into a concert version called The Gales of November, which opened on the 30th anniversary of the sinking at the Fitzgerald Theater in St. Paul, Minnesota.

A piano concerto titled The Edmund Fitzgerald was composed by American composer Geoffrey Peterson in 2002; it premiered by the Sault Symphony Orchestra in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, in November 2005 as another 30th anniversary commemoration.

Commercialization[edit]

The fame of Edmund Fitzgeralds image and historical narrative have made it public domain and subject to commercialization. A “cottage industry” has evolved across the Great Lakes region from Two Harbors, Minnesota, to Whitefish Point, the incident’s “ground zero“. Memorabilia on sale include Christmas ornaments, T-shirts, coffee mugs, Edmund Fitzgerald Porter, videos, and other items commemorating the vessel and its loss.

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Thomas, Ryland & Williamson, Samuel H. (2020). “What Was the U.S. GDP Then?”. MeasuringWorth. Retrieved September 22, 2020. United States Gross Domestic Product deflator figures follow the Measuring Worth series.
  2. ^ Andra-Warner (2006), p. 21.
  3. ^ “The Bell Recovery”. Great Lakes Shipwreck Museum. Archived from the original on April 15, 2012. Retrieved April 17, 2012.
  4. ^ “The Sinking of the SS Edmund Fitzgerald. Underworld Tales. Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  5. ^ “Looking Back on the Edmund Fitzgerald. Mount Pleasant, Michigan: WCMU-TV. Retrieved May 30, 2018.[permanent dead link]
  6. ^ Brown, Norman N. (February 17, 2006). Mighty Fitz Recounts Mystery”. U-T San Diego. Archived from the original on July 20, 2018. Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  7. ^ Bulanda (2010).
  8. ^ Alexander (2015).

References[edit]

External links[edit]

Read More

RELATED ARTICLES

764 KOMENTAR

  1. I do trust all of the ideas you have presented in your post.

    They are really convincing and can certainly work.

    Nonetheless, the posts are too short for beginners. Could you please extend them a bit
    from subsequent time? Thank you for the post.

  2. We stumbled over here different website and thought I should check things out.

    I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward to checking out your
    web page again.

  3. Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed account
    your blog posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing to your feeds and even I achievement you access consistently
    quickly.

  4. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.

    The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter
    stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an shakiness over that you wish be
    delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again as
    exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this increase.

  5. Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just your articles?

    I mean, what you say is important and everything.
    Nevertheless imagine if you added some great visuals or videos to give your posts more, “pop”!

    Your content is excellent but with images and video clips, this blog could
    certainly be one of the greatest in its niche.

    Excellent blog!

  6. Greetings! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which
    blog platform are you using for this website?
    I’m getting sick and tired of WordPress because I’ve had problems
    with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform.
    I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  7. Wow that was strange. I just wrote an incredibly long comment but
    after I clicked submit my comment didn’t show up.
    Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyhow, just wanted to say wonderful blog!

  8. Howdy, i read your blog from time to time and i own a
    similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam comments?
    If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything
    you can suggest? I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any assistance is very much appreciated.

  9. Howdy! I know this is kind of off topic but I
    was wondering if you knew where I could get a captcha plugin for my comment form?

    I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having problems
    finding one? Thanks a lot!

  10. Hey! This is my first visit to your blog! We are
    a group of volunteers and starting a new project in a community in the same niche.
    Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on. You have done
    a marvellous job!

  11. Its such as you read my mind! You seem to know so much
    about this, like you wrote the book in it or something.
    I think that you simply could do with some p.c. to power
    the message home a little bit, but other than that, that is
    magnificent blog. A fantastic read. I’ll definitely be back.

  12. Great article! That is the type of information that should be
    shared around the web. Disgrace on Google for no
    longer positioning this post higher! Come on over and talk over with my site .

    Thank you =)

  13. I’m curious to find out what blog system you happen to be working with?
    I’m having some small security problems with my latest website and I’d like to find something
    more risk-free. Do you have any recommendations?

  14. Hello there! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog.
    Is it very hard to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I
    can figure things out pretty fast. I’m thinking about making my own but I’m
    not sure where to start. Do you have any tips
    or suggestions? Thank you

  15. I feel that is among the so much important information for me.
    And i am satisfied studying your article. But want to statement
    on some common issues, The web site taste is perfect, the articles
    is in reality nice : D. Excellent job, cheers

  16. Ремонт скважин в Минске и Минской области
    Услуги по ремонту скважин в Минске становятся все более востребованными. В последние годы люди стали более вдумчиво относиться к вопросу своего здоровья, поскольку наибольшее влияние на состояние здоровья оказывает окружающая среда и то, что мы из нее черпаем. Незаменимой в жизни и деятельности человека остается вода, ведь ее влияние на наш организм поистине велико. Улучшать качество воды люди научились по-разному: в квартирах появились разного рода фильтры, водоочистительные системы, а кто-то и вовсе покупает питьевую воду, состав и происхождение которой весьма сомнительны.
    Состояние скважины и чистота воды Люди, знакомые с нынешними технологиями, предпочитают воду из скважин, пробуренных на своем участке. Подобный вариант считается эффективнее, поскольку такая вода очищена от загрязнений самой природой и существенно отличается от водопроводной полезным химическим составом. Большинство скважин на участках находится в пределах Минска и Минской области. Пользуясь скважиной, нужно понимать, что она, как и другое оборудование, нуждается в уходе. Несмотря на долгосрочность служения, не исключены потребности мелкого ремонта скважины и очищения от скопившихся отложений.Необходимость проведения ремонта скважины
    Опираясь на количество ремонтных работ в Минске и Минской области, сотрудники компании «БурАвтоГрупп» составили список основных случаев ремонта:Повреждение водоподъемного оборудования
    Изношенное состояние обсадных труб или же повреждение сальниковых устройств
    Снижение дебита. Если вода поступает плохо, не стоит тут же делать вывод, что она вышла из строя. Подобная проблема требует тщательной проверки и поиска проблемы. В конечном итоге, каждая из этих причин исправима правильным планом ремонта и качественной технологией его выполнения.
    Разновидность работ по ремонту скважин в Минске
    Прочистка скважины предполагает проведение следующих работ:
    Скребкование
    Метод свабирования
    Метод гидравлического удара
    Пневмоимпульсный метод
    Вибрационные и звуковые методы.
    Каждый из них подразумевает улучшение проходимости скважины посредством чистки ее от рыхлых осадков, ставших причиной закупорки внутренней поверхности и фильтров.Трубы и из замена
    Более трудоемкий процесс подразумевает замещение обсадных труб с их извлечением по различным причинам. Такие виды работ выполняются, если нет возможности поместить в скважину другую колонну меньшего диаметра. Подобная колонна при опускании создает гидравлический удар, в результате которого образование скорости подачи воды выше, чем ранее.
    Ремонт скважинного оборудования в Минске
    Это одна из «популярных» причин выхода скважины из строя, а ее ремонт подразумевает замену насоса. Основные точки обрывов — это места стыкования оборудования или труб между собой. Главной причиной обрыва в любом месте остается коррозия.Стоимость ремонта скважин в Минске Стоимость ремонта в Минске и области будет завесить от трех факторов:
    Тип поломки Состояние самой скважины Ее местоположение. Вопросы гарантии При заключении контракта на бурение или ремонт скважины в Минске с нашей компанией, вы получаете гарантию на оказанный вид ремонтных работ. В последующем вы сможете быть спокойны за техническую исправность вашей скважины, а ваша семья получит по-настоящему чистую, вкусную и полезную воду. Отметим, что наша компания оказывает полный комплекс услуг по водоснабжению — бурение скважин в Минске, обустройство, установку насосного оборудования и др.

  17. Having read this I believed it was extremely informative.
    I appreciate you finding the time and effort to put this information together.
    I once again find myself personally spending a lot of time both reading and posting comments.
    But so what, it was still worth it!

  18. Pretty great post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wished
    to mention that I have really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts.
    In any case I’ll be subscribing in your feed and I am hoping you write once more
    soon!

  19. Coi Bóng Đá Trực Tuyếndaklak 24hReal có liên tiếp hai bàn ở những phút cuối nhưng ko thể lật ngược tình thế trên bảng xếp thứ hạng. Dù 2 trận đấu này diễn ra bên trên sảnh trung lập tại UAE, luật bàn thắng sân khách vẫn được áp dụng. Theo thông báo của UEFA, các trận đấu sẽ diễn ra tập trung ở thành phố Hồ Chí Minh Lisbon (Bồ Đào Nha).

  20. This is really interesting, You are an overly skilled blogger.
    I’ve joined your feed and sit up for in the hunt for extra of your magnificent
    post. Additionally, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks

  21. you are in reality a excellent webmaster.
    The site loading velocity is incredible. It seems
    that you are doing any distinctive trick. Also, The contents are masterwork.
    you’ve performed a great job in this topic!

  22. I’m impressed, I have to admit. Seldom do I
    come across a blog that’s both equally educative and entertaining, and without a doubt,
    you have hit the nail on the head. The issue is something which too few folks are speaking intelligently about.
    I’m very happy I stumbled across this in my search for something concerning this.

  23. best free dating apps for cougars white dating black man online dating no one responds had sex with guy whole dating girl list of all free dating site for pc pouchshaped being short guy dating best anime dating sim android interracial dating in pennsylvania dating korean girl jkf dating visual novel free nude dating after college for woman cyber safety when online dating online dating for zaneta matthews meme men pose with fish in dating profiels why is carbon dating inaccurate best online dating in chennai united state most porular dating site online dating for average man dating a married man wont end well free dating site in nigeria lagos

  24. Hello all, guys! I know, my topic may be too specific for this forum,
    But my sister found nice man here and they married, so how about me?! 🙂

    I am 26 years old, Maria, from Romania, know English and Russian languages also
    And… I have specific disease, named nymphomania. Who know what is this, can understand me (better to say it immediately)

    Ah yes, I cook very tasty! and I love not only cook ;))
    Im real girl, not prostitute, and looking for serious and hot relationship…

    My photo:

    ___
    Added later:

    Ooops! Seems that photo broken, sorry =(
    Anyway, you can find my profile here:
    datingforlove.net/profile/LindseySaL/

    Or write to me via Telegram @LindseySaL

    P.S. Moderator, Supervisor – dont write to me, trolls! >:-(

  25. Howdy just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the
    pictures aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why but
    I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different browsers and both show the same outcome.

  26. Thanks a bunch for sharing this with all folks you really understand what you’re
    speaking about! Bookmarked. Kindly also visit my web site =).

    We can have a hyperlink exchange agreement between us

  27. This design is incredible! You obviously know how to
    keep a reader amused. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved
    to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Excellent job.
    I really enjoyed what you had to say, and more
    than that, how you presented it. Too cool!

  28. Hello there, There’s no doubt that your site may be having internet browser compatibility issues.
    When I take a look at your web site in Safari, it looks fine however,
    when opening in I.E., it has some overlapping issues.
    I just wanted to provide you with a quick heads up!
    Besides that, excellent blog!

  29. I just could not depart your website prior to suggesting that I really loved
    the standard information a person supply for your guests?
    Is going to be again continuously in order to check out new posts

  30. It is appropriate time to make some plans for the
    future and it’s time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I want to suggest you some
    interesting things or advice. Perhaps you could write next articles referring
    to this article. I wish to read even more things about it!

  31. Excellent post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed!
    Very helpful info specifically the last part 🙂 I
    care for such info a lot. I was seeking this particular info for a very long time.
    Thank you and good luck.

  32. Today, I went to the beach front with my kids. I found a sea shell
    and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell to her ear and screamed.

    There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear. She
    never wants to go back! LoL I know this is totally off topic but I had to tell someone!

  33. Reduce, be a part of, trim, mix, delete elements, break up audio recordsdata. Right here in this article we will discuss 10 most frequently chosen software program tools, that aren’t simply MP3 joiner however can be used to do extra. Some are audio editing software while some will work on not simply [url]https://www.mp3joiner.org[/url] audio recordsdata, but additionally video files. Some will enable you to slice and dice audio information and a few will let you have predetermined output qualities for one, each or sure audio tracks in a playlist.
    After you extract the audio recordsdata from MP4 or download information to MP3, you possibly can choose some free MP3 joiner to mix a surprising song in accordance with your fashion. Simply learn extra detail about the top 10 free MP3 joiners beneath.
    Maybe you may have tons of MP3 or every other audio files in codecs like WAV, FLAC, M4A, AAC, M4B, AC3 and you are trying to mix them into a big one as a way to benefit from the files orderly and with out interrupts or upload the complete one to your web sites to share it with your family, friends or even people all over the world.
    With Free Straightforward MP3 Joiner, you can fast merge, combine and be part of multiple music MP3 files into a bigger MP3 file in a cut up second with out recompressing and without high quality loss. What’s extra, it enables you to be a part [url]https://www.mp3joiner.org[/url] of your separate audiobook chapters into one huge audiobook or mix many various music tracks into one non-stop audio CD. It brings probably the most creative and exciting experience of becoming a member of and merging MP3 & different audio information willingly and conveniently.
    Click the “Profile” drop-down button to pick MP3 as output profiles from the “Normal Audio” category. Edit metadata and album artwork of MP3 and other audio files. Easy MP3 Cutter Joiner Editor shows you the waveform of the audio file and you’ll choose, copy, paste, minimize, delete, trim, insert and silence elements of the MP3 or audio file.
    Tips: Faasoft Audio Joiner allows to rearrange file order earlier than merging if needed. MP3 Joiner is a light-weight application that serves one main function, specifically that of merging your MP3 files, with very little user input being required within the course of.
    MP3 Splitter & Joiner is a helpful application which is intended in enhancing audio information. It is a multi-perform device as it consists of MP3 Splitter and MP3 Joiner in a single package. Customers could break up, trim MP3 file into portions, be a part of, and even merge multiple information into large information.
    After you extract the audio information from MP4 or obtain files to MP3, you’ll be able to choose some free MP3 joiner to mix a shocking tune in accordance with your type. Simply study more element in regards to the high 10 free MP3 joiners below.

  34. I’m not sure exactly why but this website is loading extremely slow for me.
    Is anyone else having this issue or is it a issue on my end?

    I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.

  35. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and
    wanted to say that I have truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts.
    In any case I will be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again very soon!

  36. chicago asian women for dating free cupid internet dating site amazon women dating sites dating older girl in college dating as a closeted transgender man misanthropical senior dating agency spain ideas for online dating first message qr meet up dating sites not dating but marriage kdrama talking about yourself on a dating site free online dating looking for single man dating sites for millionaires in the uk dating a black guy vs white guy reddit perth wa dating sites one and done online dating bakersfield ca dating watch the dating guy online free dating site for hippies first sight speed dating prague online dating profile bio template

  37. Yesterday, while I was at work, my cousin stole my iPad and tested to see
    if it can survive a 40 foot drop, just so she can be
    a youtube sensation. My iPad is now destroyed and she has 83
    views. I know this is entirely off topic but I had to share it with someone!

  38. Have you ever considered publishing an e-book or guest authoring
    on other websites? I have a blog centered on the same subjects you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I
    know my visitors would enjoy your work. If you are
    even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e mail.

  39. Привет!!

    Акт безвозмездной передачи имущества образец. Поэтому мы не сомневаемся что и у вас получится. Контакты 6 4 являются основными нормально разомкнутыми замыкаются при повышении температуры. При проведении контрольной проверки в пассажирском поезде привлекаются представители владельца подвижного состава. Это может быть как пригорание контактов электромагнитного реле так и выход из строя электронной схемы реле поворотов. По этой теме отличный вебсайт по ссылке https://klin-service.ru/ .
    Автоматический пошаговый пуск позволяет производит пуск установки в шаговом режиме сброс давления продувка азотом продувка электролитическими газами набор давления работа на потребителя останов. Проточите контактные кольца в случае если не удаляются пригары кольца имеют неровную поверхность или их износ превышает 0,5 мм по диаметру. Харьковский станкостроительный завод выпускает круглошлифовальные станки с настольным переналаживаемым прибором активного контроля а также с прибором визуального контроля. В таком случае как сделать чтобы бесперебойник не отключался понятно сразу. Замена масла в роботе.
    Успехов всем!

  40. What i do not understood is if truth be told how you’re no longer actually a
    lot more well-preferred than you may be right now.
    You’re so intelligent. You recognize thus considerably relating to this matter, produced
    me individually consider it from so many
    numerous angles. Its like men and women aren’t interested until it is one
    thing to do with Lady gaga! Your individual stuffs great.
    Always deal with it up!

  41. Unquestionably consider that that you said. Your favorite reason appeared to be at the net the easiest factor to understand of.
    I say to you, I definitely get irked whilst folks consider worries that
    they just don’t understand about. You managed to hit the nail upon the highest and also defined out the entire thing
    with no need side effect , other folks can take
    a signal. Will likely be again to get more. Thanks

  42. Greetings from Idaho! I’m bored to death at work so I decided to browse your site on my iphone during lunch
    break. I love the information you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.

    I’m surprised at how quick your blog loaded on my cell phone ..
    I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, very good site!

  43. Hello would you mind letting me know which hosting company
    you’re using? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different
    internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most.

    Can you suggest a good web hosting provider at a fair price?
    Cheers, I appreciate it!

  44. What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I have discovered It absolutely helpful and it has aided me out
    loads. I hope to contribute & aid other customers like its helped me.
    Great job.

  45. Hi there would you mind letting me know which hosting company you’re working with?
    I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different
    internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker
    then most. Can you suggest a good web hosting provider at a reasonable price?
    Thanks a lot, I appreciate it!

  46. naturally like your web site but you need to take a look
    at the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of
    them are rife with spelling problems and I in finding it very bothersome to inform the reality
    however I’ll certainly come again again.

  47. Hi there! This is my first visit to your blog!
    We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new
    initiative in a community in the same niche.
    Your blog provided us valuable information to work
    on. You have done a wonderful job!

  48. Greetings! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this
    site? I’m getting fed up of WordPress because I’ve had problems with hackers and I’m looking at alternatives for another platform.
    I would be fantastic if you could point me in the direction of
    a good platform.

  49. When I initially left a comment I seem to have clicked the -Notify
    me when new comments are added- checkbox and now whenever a comment is added
    I receive four emails with the exact same comment.
    There has to be a means you are able to remove me from that service?

    Thanks!

  50. I’m extremely impressed with your writing skills and
    also with the layout on your blog. Is this a
    paid theme or did you modify it yourself? Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s rare
    to see a great blog like this one these days.

  51. Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all people you actually recognize what you’re talking approximately!
    Bookmarked. Kindly also seek advice from my
    site =). We can have a link change contract between us

  52. I am really impressed with your writing skills and also
    with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid
    theme or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing,
    it’s rare to see a nice blog like this one nowadays.

  53. Someone necessarily lend a hand to make significantly
    posts I might state. That is the very first time I frequented your
    web page and up to now? I amazed with the analysis you made to make this actual submit incredible.
    Fantastic process!

  54. I simply couldn’t depart your website before suggesting that I really loved the
    usual information a person provide for your visitors? Is gonna be again continuously in order to check up on new posts

  55. Hi there! I could have sworn I’ve visited this web site before
    but after looking at many of the articles I realized it’s new to me.
    Nonetheless, I’m definitely happy I came across it and I’ll be bookmarking it and
    checking back often!

  56. certainly like your web site but you have to test the spelling on several of your posts.
    A number of them are rife with spelling issues
    and I in finding it very bothersome to inform the
    reality on the other hand I will surely come
    back again.

  57. My programmer is trying to persuade me to move to .net from PHP.
    I have always disliked the idea because of the
    costs. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on various websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to another platform.

    I have heard good things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can import all my wordpress posts into it?
    Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated!

  58. Hey, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility issues.
    When I look at your website in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet
    Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
    Other then that, awesome blog!

  59. Just desire to say your article is as astounding. The clearness in your post is
    simply great and i can assume you’re an expert on this subject.
    Well with your permission allow me to grab your RSS feed to keep
    updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please carry on the gratifying work.

  60. Excellent post. Keep writing such kind of information on your page.
    Im really impressed by it.
    Hi there, You have done an excellent job. I will
    definitely digg it and individually recommend to my friends.
    I am confident they will be benefited from this website.

  61. I believe everything posted was actually very reasonable.
    However, consider this, suppose you wrote a catchier post title?

    I ain’t suggesting your information is not good., however suppose
    you added a title to possibly grab folk’s attention? I mean SS Edmund Fitzgerald
    (sank 45 years ago today) – Keren Link is kinda
    boring. You ought to glance at Yahoo’s home page and note how they create news headlines to get viewers to click.
    You might try adding a video or a pic or two to grab people interested about
    everything’ve written. In my opinion, it might bring your posts
    a little livelier.

  62. Hello there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog.
    Is it very difficult to set up your own blog?
    I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast.

    I’m thinking about making my own but I’m not sure where to start.

    Do you have any tips or suggestions? Cheers

  63. Have you ever considered publishing an e-book or guest authoring on other sites?

    I have a blog based upon on the same subjects you discuss and
    would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know
    my readers would appreciate your work. If you’re even remotely interested, feel
    free to shoot me an e mail.

  64. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but
    I find this matter to be actually something that I think I would never understand.
    It seems too complex and extremely broad for me. I am looking forward
    for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of
    it!

  65. Компания сигареты оптом работает уже более 20 лет для российском рынке, мы предлагаем настоящий беспредельный запас табачных изделий сообразно цене ниже оптовых. Мы работаем на прямую с известными брендами а беспричинно же крупными поставщиками табака.
    для заказа и информации перехотите по ссылке ниже:
    сигареты оптом интернет магазин

  66. I am really impressed with your writing skills as well as with
    the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself?

    Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it is rare to see a great blog like
    this one these days.

  67. Hello this is somewhat of off topic but I was wondering if blogs
    use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML.
    I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding experience so I wanted
    to get guidance from someone with experience.
    Any help would be enormously appreciated!

  68. An interesting discussion is worth comment.

    I do think that you need to write more about this subject, it may not be a taboo subject but typically people don’t
    talk about such issues. To the next! Best wishes!!

  69. I’m now not certain where you are getting your information,
    however great topic. I must spend a while finding out more or
    understanding more. Thank you for magnificent information I used to be
    in search of this info for my mission.

  70. В Pinterest с 2012 г. Реклама в нем дает Заказчикам из Etsy, Shopify, amazon заработки от 7000 до 100 000 usd в месяц. http://1541.ru Ручная работа, Цена 300-1000 usd за месяц

  71. Вам сможете проконтролировать данное вследствие 3 главным функциям. Проектирование сеть интернет-клуба был целиком переделан. Сокет никак не подобен в прочие веб-сайты. В Случае Если модель входа также авторизации все без исключения еще располагается наверху, главная панелька навигации движется во сторонку.
    1xbet kz букмекерская контора официальный сайт

  72. I absolutely love your site.. Great colors & theme.
    Did you create this web site yourself? Please reply back as I’m attempting
    to create my own personal site and want to know where you got this from or
    exactly what the theme is called. Appreciate it!

  73. Today, I went to the beach with my children. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.”
    She placed the shell to her ear and screamed.
    There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.
    She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is completely off topic but I had to tell
    someone!

  74. I used to be recommended this blog by way of my
    cousin. I am not certain whether or not this put up is written through him
    as nobody else realize such distinct approximately my problem.
    You’re incredible! Thanks!

  75. Greetings from Los angeles! I’m bored at work so I decided to browse your site on my
    iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the information you
    present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.
    I’m shocked at how quick your blog loaded on my phone ..

    I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, amazing site!

  76. Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is valuable and everything. But just
    imagine if you added some great pictures or videos to give your posts more, “pop”!
    Your content is excellent but with pics and videos,
    this site could definitely be one of the most beneficial in its niche.
    Awesome blog!

  77. Definitely believe that which you stated.
    Your favorite reason seemed to be on the internet the easiest thing
    to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people think about worries that
    they just don’t know about. You managed to hit
    the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people can take a signal.
    Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  78. Hello superb blog! Does running a blog like this take a large
    amount of work? I have virtually no expertise in computer programming but I was hoping to start my own blog in the near future.
    Anyhow, should you have any suggestions or techniques for new blog owners please share.
    I understand this is off topic however I simply needed to ask.
    Appreciate it!

  79. My brother suggested I might like this website.
    He was totally right. This post truly made my day. You
    cann’t imagine just how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!

  80. Do you mind if I quote a couple of your
    posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to
    your webpage? My website is in the very same niche as yours and my visitors would definitely benefit from a lot of the information you provide here.
    Please let me know if this alright with you.
    Regards!

  81. I do trust all the ideas you have offered on your
    post. They’re really convincing and will certainly work. Still, the posts
    are too brief for novices. May you please extend them a little from next time?
    Thank you for the post.

  82. Today, while I was at work, my sister stole my iphone and tested to see
    if it can survive a 25 foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My iPad is
    now broken and she has 83 views. I know this is
    totally off topic but I had to share it with someone!

  83. Today, I went to the beach front with my children. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4
    year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She placed the shell to her ear and screamed.
    There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.
    She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is entirely off topic
    but I had to tell someone!

  84. Hi there, I found your website via Google at the same time as searching for a related topic, your site got here up, it appears to be like good. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, simply become aware of your blog thru Google, and located that it is really informative. I’m going to be careful for brussels. I will be grateful for those who continue this in future. Numerous people will be benefited out of your writing. Cheers! ricinolja mot förstoppning seder.sewomabest.com/map18.php

  85. Today, I went to the beach with my children. I found a sea
    shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said
    “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She placed the shell to her ear
    and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched
    her ear. She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is completely off topic but
    I had to tell someone!

  86. I all the time used to study piece of writing in news papers
    but now as I am a user of internet therefore from now I am using net for articles or reviews, thanks to web.

  87. Доброго времени суток друзья
    О компании КОНТАКТЫ ДОКУМЕНТЫ ОТЗЫВЫ НАШИ РАБОТЫ
    Буровая компания «БурТехСервис» образована в апреле 2010 года и с тех пор активно осуществляет свою деятельность, не испытывая дефицита работы. Штат специалистов 10 человек позволяет нам быть задействованными в нескольких проектах одновременно. Наши сотрудники отличаются высоким уровнем профессионализма и обладают опытом деятельности в этой сфере вот уже 10 лет. Мы специализируемся на решении задач по комплексному водоснабжению и канализации в частных домах и коттеджах под ключ, осуществляем сервисное обслуживание и ремонт скважин, устанавливаем фильтры для очистки воды, а также другие специальные виды работ по бурению скважин широкого назначения – скважины на песок и артезианские скважины, находящиеся на глубине от 20 до 200 м.

    burtehservice-logo
    Мы – профессионалы своего дела!
    Мы специализируемся на бурении и обустройстве скважин любой сложности. Пробурили уже более тысячи скважин. Каждый новый проект давал нам возможность расти и расширяться, учиться и совершенствовать свое мастерство в этой сфере. Мы не привыкли видеть в Вас клиента, мы хотим, чтобы на время нашего сотрудничества Вы стали нашим партнером, с которым пройдя путь от начального этапа Вашего заказа, мы выйдем на конечный рубеж доставив Вам комфорт от осуществленных нами услуг. Мы рады раскрыть свой потенциал на ваших объектах и готовы к сотрудничеству.

    Дубовик Евгений Викторович – Индивидуальный предприниматель.
    Основные виды деятельности:
    Бурение скважин на воду;
    Монтаж систем водоснабжения;
    Монтаж фильтров водоочистки;
    Монтаж систем канализации;
    Сервисное обслуживание систем водоснабжения, водоочистки и канализации;
    История в цифрах
    2010 — Год основания компании. Специалисты компании «БурТехСервис» оказывают услуги комплексного водоснабжения объектов. Штат сотрудников включает специалистов, имеющих аккредитацию, а также специалистов с опытом работы не менее 10 лет в данной сфере.

    2014 — Компания динамично развивается, наращивает объемы выполняемых работ по обеспечению частных лиц и предприятий водой, строительство ВЗУ, бурение промышленных скважин, работы в Минской области и регионах Гродненской области.

    2020 — Сегодня компания «БурТехСервис» занимает одно из лидирующих мест среди буровых компаний оказывающих услуги по бурению скважин и водоснабжению объектов. Серьезный опыт вот уже 10 лет в оказываемых нами услугах. Сформированы все штатные единицы компании. Персонал постоянно повышает свою квалификацию. Наличие собственной буровой и строительной техники.

    Предоставляемое оборудование
    Компания «БурТехСервис» использует оборудование фирмы БурСпецТехника, Партнер, МОЗБТ.

  88. Its like you read my mind! You appear to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something.
    I think that you could do with a few pics to
    drive the message home a little bit, but other than that, this is magnificent blog.
    A fantastic read. I’ll certainly be back.

  89. Hi there would you mind stating which blog platform you’re working with?

    I’m going to start my own blog soon but I’m having a tough time making a decision between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different
    then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique.
    P.S My apologies for being off-topic but I had to ask!

  90. Hmm is anyone else encountering problems with the
    images on this blog loading? I’m trying to figure out if its a problem
    on my end or if it’s the blog. Any responses would be greatly appreciated.

  91. Definitely believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason appeared to be on the net the easiest thing to be aware of.
    I say to you, I certainly get irked while people think about worries that
    they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side
    effect , people can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more.
    Thanks

  92. I have been exploring for a little bit for any high-quality articles or
    weblog posts on this kind of house . Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this site.
    Studying this information So i am glad to show that I have
    an incredibly good uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed.
    I so much indubitably will make sure to do not disregard this website and provides it a glance regularly.

  93. Kaymme ensin artikkelissa kaikki ylla olevat asiat lyhyesti lapi, jonka jalkeen syvennymme niihin tarkemmin. Luettuasi taman taydellisen oppaan kasinoista ilman rekisteroitymista, tulet tietamaan naista nettikasinoista kaiken seka hieman enemmankin.
    Verkkosivusto: nettikasinot

  94. I think what you posted was actually very reasonable.
    But, what about this? what if you typed a catchier post title?

    I am not suggesting your information is not good, but suppose you added something that grabbed folk’s attention? I mean SS Edmund Fitzgerald (sank 45 years
    ago today) – Keren Link is a little plain. You should peek at
    Yahoo’s front page and watch how they create
    article titles to grab people to open the links.

    You might add a video or a pic or two to get people interested about what you’ve written. In my opinion,
    it could bring your website a little livelier.

  95. I am curious to find out what blog platform you’re using?
    I’m experiencing some minor security issues with my latest site and I would like
    to find something more risk-free. Do you have any
    recommendations?

  96. Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your blog
    and in accession capital to assert that I acquire actually
    enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing to your
    feeds and even I achievement you access consistently quickly.

  97. Its like you learn my mind! You seem to grasp so much about this,
    like you wrote the guide in it or something. I feel that
    you can do with a few percent to pressure the message house a little bit, but other than that,
    this is magnificent blog. A fantastic read. I’ll certainly be back.

  98. you’re in reality a good webmaster. The website loading pace is amazing.
    It seems that you are doing any unique trick.
    In addition, The contents are masterpiece. you have performed a excellent task in this topic!